Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny, 2015, R. 23, Nr 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23458

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny, 2015, R. 23, Nr 1 wg Temat "Bóg"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Homo deificatus
    Jastrzębski, Andrzej (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2015)
    Theosis (deificatio) was one of the major theological topics early in both, Eastern and Western Churches. The concept of theosis wouldn’t be a favorite tool for contemporary theologians to express the basic call of the human being to become like God (moral perfection). The human being was created as an image of God and through the grace is to become His resemblance (similitude). The process of deification is a way of transforming the human being with the power of God’s grace operating in the sacraments of the Church, in God’s similitude – as far as it is possible in this life. It doesn’t mean that the human being would become literary God but rather that he or she would become fully human. This article is an attempt at illustrating this process based on the teaching of the Fathers of the Church and their contemporary commentators.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Krytyczna rekonstrukcja głównych założeń analitycznej teologii naturalnej J. Hicka
    Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2015)
    A synthetic depiction of John Hick’s philosophical reflections proves that in his research the religion-oriented theodicy issues come to the fore. The natural theology, or rather the philosophy of religion, proposed by him aims at (1) questioning the conclusivity of any attempts at supporting arguments for the existence of God (the cosmological or the ontological arguments). He claims that the measures taken in those arguments by no means stand up any logical criticism. On the other hand (2), John Hick puts forward an original proposal of an argument named as “eschatological verification”. This way of constructing arguments particularly appeals to him as he is immune to allegations against the inconsequence of metaphysical conclusions. He bases it on the intuition of logical consistency, though on the horizon of the very religious faith. Therefore, the “eschatological verification” formulated by the author of The fifth dimension and his highly controversial theory of “religious relativistic pluralism” boils down to an a priori quasi-religious concept of the world, a concept that cannot be subjected to any rational (logical) verification. His proposal only results from the projected coherence of religious experience.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Nowy ateizm w perspektywie teologicznej
    Zatwardnicki, Sławomir (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2015)
    Judeo-Christian Revelation shows not only God, but also a man, and all the reality as well, especially in their relation to God. Therefore, one is allowed to talk about “lay heresies”, that is the wrong understanding of the created reality. The “Christological formula” of Chalcedon stressing the synthesis that takes place “unconfusedly and indivisibly” can help to estimate the degree to which the “new atheism” is a heretical interpretation of reality; it happens when things that are created are “divided” from the Creator, which, in turn, leads to “monophysitic” perception of the world chosen by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens.