Studia Gdańskie, 2004, T. 17

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/26788

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Studia Gdańskie, 2004, T. 17 wg Temat "biblistyka"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Bóg albo pieniądz. Wymagania Kościoła pierwotnego od katechumenów na podstawie perykopy Mk 10,17-31
    Ormanty, Stanisław (Kuria Metropolitalna Gdańska, 2004)
    The article begins with a nontraditional exegetical interpretation of Mark 10, 17-31 in which there exist two paths in the life of man. The first is the path of the commandments, which is for regular mortals, that is, those who are satisfied with fulfilling the minimum. The second is the path of evangelical rules for those, who wish to follow this path because they want something more. These are the people who enter into religious orders. In the analysis of Mark 10, 17-31, the author of the articles looks at the sitz in Leben of the early Church. He follows the thought of C. M. Martini, who sees in the gospel of Mark catechumenal context. The structure of this biblical fragment is given as follows: the question of the rich man (Mark 10, 17-22); the problem of the salvation of the wealthy (Mark 10, 23-27); the reward for imitating Jesus (Mark 10, 28-31). After this, the author continues with interpreting the text itself. The final point made is the function of the Mark 10, 17-31 in its context, that is, that the biblical fragment is dominated by the topic of eschatological salvation, eternal life, the entering into the kingdom of God, and of being redeemed.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    „Oko za oko, ząb za ząb”. Formuła talionu w biblijnym prawie Izraela
    Szamocki, Grzegorz (Kuria Metropolitalna Gdańska, 2004)
    This paper presents an interpretative study of the talion formula: “eye for eye, tooth for tooth”, occurring in three law codes of the Old Testament, shown against a background of history, function and meaning of this principle in the oldoriental law, particularly in the Code of Hammurabi, as well as in fundamental rules of the oldtestamental law. The research has showed that the famous formula of the Bible should be understood in the meaning of a rule, which confirms the legislator’s intention to protect a human life, especially in the dimension of the social human relations. The expression “eye for eye, tooth for tooth”, stated in the context of a concrete law regulation cannot be understood as a calling to retaliate, revenge, but as an order to rightly pay for harms and give equivalents. Such form of satisfaction should also be an external sign of conciliation between an offender and their victim, what would make possible a new common life in peace.