The Biblical Annals, 2016, T. 6, nr 2
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/22973
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj The Biblical Annals, 2016, T. 6, nr 2 wg Temat "biblical philology"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Harvard Lycopolitan John – kolejne fałszerstwo? Koptyjski manuskrypt w świetle Ewangelii Żony Jezusa i współczesnych badańBąk, Tomasz (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2016)On 18 September 2015, during the International Congress of Coptic Studies in Rome, Professor Karen L. King from Harvard Divinity School, presented a previously unpublished Coptic papyrus fragment, known as the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife. This text was among the scraps of ancient manuscripts, one of which is known as the Harvard Lycopolitan John and contains small fragments from the Gospel of John. In my article I attempt to analyze this second manuscript and demonstrate, on the basis of various scientific examinations performed by contemporary scholars, that the aforementioned Gospel of Jesus’ Wife, and also the Harvard Lycopolitan John, are modern creations. Unknown origin of the HLJ, unusual dimensions of the manuscript, dialectal implausibility, linguistic errors, etc. – all these phenomena allow us to treat the Harvard Lycopolitan John as a forgery, which was faithfully copied from Herbert Thompson’s 1924 edition of the fourth-century Lycopolitan “Qau codex”.Pozycja John C. Poirier – Jeffrey Peterson (eds.), Marcan Priority without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis (Library of New Testament Studies 455; London: Bloomsbury – New York: T&T Clark, 2015). Pp. XIV + 272. $110,00. ISBN 978-0-56715-913-7.Adamczewski, Bartosz (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2016)Pozycja Pierwotne brzmienie tekstu? Refleksje nad krytyką tekstualną BibliiLipiński, Edward (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2016)The textual criticism of the Bible, as viewed traditionally, has for its primary object the reconstruction of the original text from manuscript versions and quotations in ancient writings. Since biblical texts have been often expanded and changed in Antiquity, it is not evident what one should regard as original version. Therefore, the scientific object of textual criticism is to trace the history of the text, to identify and characterize its various recensions or adaptations. This is done in the article by examining a few cases in order to illustrate various kinds of intentional changes or developments and of accidental errors, which happened most often in foreign words, place-names, and personal names. Besides, the same consonantal texts can sometimes be understood in different ways, the masoretic vocalization being one of these interpretations.