Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny, 2005, Tom 58, nr 2
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/38995
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny, 2005, Tom 58, nr 2 wg Tytuł
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 7 z 7
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Jan Paweł II – człowiek dobryWronka, Stanisław (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)Pozycja Ks. Kazimierz Panuś, Wielcy mówcy Kościoła, Kraków 2004, Wydawnictwo UNUM, 481 s.Szelińska, Wacława (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)Pozycja Morze w Piśmie ŚwiętymWodecki, Bernard (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)Pozycja Mowa eschatologiczna Jezusa – teologia ῖερόν (Mk 13)Mikołajczak, Mieczysław (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)Pozycja Muzealne zbiory w służbie misji ad gentesGórski, Jan (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)The church from the beginning of its missionary work tried to substantiate it. Among other things, missionaries kept in their archives artifacts which proved the culture of peoples or nations they evangelized. Not only did they try to preserve local culture but also supported its development. The treasures of culture they collected and kept, in time proliferated and created impressive collections, the cataloguing and exhibiting of which served missionary education. The paper commences with showing the contribution of the church to the preservation of culture of evangelized nations, then it elaborates on the animation and educational role of missionary exhibitions and closes with formal and educational aims which should be accomplished by museums and missionary collections.Pozycja Orkiestra króla Nabuchodonozora II czy zespół Antiocha IV Epifanesa? Kilka uwag muzykologaKubies, Grzegorz (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)The article is an attempt to answer two questions set at the beginning of the article about the instruments and the origin of the band described in the book of Daniel 3: 5, 7, 10 and 15. After short historical remarks, the current knowledge about the instruments mentioned in the book of Daniel is presented. To all of the seven terms (for comparative purposes) Greek and Latin equivalents were added, as well as the etymology. In case of the disputable terms the most important hypothesis were put forward, forming (more than once erroneously) mainly through the translational practice an image of the musical scene. In the next part, first the Hellenic (2nd century B. C.) and then – supported by the author – Mesopotamian (6th century B. C.) hypothesis about the origin of the band are discussed. The subject of the article is set in the context of the reflections on the musical cultures of ancient Greece and Mesopotamia. The musicological discourse is based in the first place on the preserved iconographical evidence and, to a lesser degree, on the stationery one. Five modern Polish translations of Daniel 3: 5, 7, 10 and 15 and a comment on them form the final part of the article.Pozycja XII Ekumeniczne Dni Biblijne (2005)Towarzystwo Biblijne w Polsce (Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, 2005)

