Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1971, T. 18, z. 1
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/7972
Przeglądaj
Ostatnie zgłoszenia
Pozycja Edykt Cyrusa w Ezd 1 w świetle tekstów biblijnych i pozabiblijnych a myśl teologiczna kronikarzaLangkammer, Hugolin (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Nieprzyjaciele w PsalmachŁach, Stanisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1970)There often arises the problem of „enemies” in the Psalms persecuting the Psalmists. Since in the studies the Psalmists are no longer identified with David there exists an unceasing discussion among scholars not only about the identification of the Psalmists themselves but also about the identification of their persecuting enemies. No satisfactory answer has been given by those who following Smend’s hypothesis, which explains a collective „I” in the Psalms, considered the persecuted to be the devout (hasîdîm ) Israelites and the persecuting enemies to be the disloyal Israelites who abandoned their Law (Rahlfs). No sufficient answer has been also given in the studies of those who, regarding a cult the origin of the Psalms, considered „enemies” to be: either sorcerers bringing about misfortunes on the others (Mowinckel), or foreign enemies of Israel whom the Israelit kings intended to defeat with Jahve’s help (Birkeniand), or the false accusers of the innocent (Schmidt), or the ones who chased those who sought sanctuary in the temple (Delekat) or demanded a righteous judgement (Beyerlin). After a critical examination of the above-mentioned opinions the author presented different definitions of „enemies” as well as various changes occuring in the Psalms as regards a denotation of „enemies” and their hostile activities. On the grounds of this material and especially on the grounds of contents of the prayers of the persecuted the author arrieved at the conclusion that „enemies” in the Psalms were anonymous private individuals who intended consciously or unconsciously to dissuade the Psalmist (Balla) from a fidelity to Jahve and His Testament.Pozycja Śp. ks. prof. Eugeniusz Dąbrowski (1901-1970)Kudasiewicz, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja VIII Kongres Biblistów Polskich w WarszawieSzlaga, Jan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja H.C.M. Vogt, Studie zür nachexllischen Gemeinde in Esra-Nehemia, Werl 1966, ss. XIX+162.Langkammer, Hugolin (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Chrystus i apostołowie jako fundament KościołaSzlaga, Jan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Historia i eschatologia u prorokówStachowiak, Lech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Układ literacki Prz 1-9Potocki, Stanisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Interpretacja mesjańska Psalmu 22Kuc, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)Pozycja Myśl o posłaniu Chrystusa w Nowym TestamencieGryglewicz, Feliks (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1971)After the examinatiori of all the texts in the New Testament dealing with Christ’s mission the author states that the thought about Christ’s mission occures from the oldest to the latest parts of the New Testament. All the elements of this notion already appeared in the synoptic gospels. Among the Jews in Palestine it was connected with the promise of the arrival of Messiah and in St. John with the idea of Logos. Throughout the New Testament it is expressed by various means; Apostle Paul deepened its theological character, but it becomes a dominant idea first of all in St. John’s gospel. Here it occured in its basie role by stressing the connections between Jesus Christ and God and confirming authority and divine nature of Christ. St. John also gave the most profound definition of its theological importance for the showed clearly God’s motivations as regards the mission and defined very explicitly its purpose. Therefore it was St. John who pointed to Christ as the one who made a widely known idea of God’s messenger come true.