Analecta Cracoviensia, 1986, T. 18
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/34816
Przeglądaj
Ostatnie zgłoszenia
Pozycja Problem cierpienia w perspektywach whiteheadowskiej filozofii procesuŻyciński, Józef (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Sharing the opinion that the explicative power of different philosophical systems depends on their languages and basic assumptions, the author raises the question whether the existing human suffering cannot be explained in Whiteheadian metaphysics in a more adequate manner than in the systems of classical philosophy. After presenting basic terms introduced in Whitehead’s Process and Reality the author develops some Haritshornian ideas dealing with the divine solidarity with suffering men and investigates A. R. Peacocke’s comments on the so-called structural necessity. Metaphysical interpretations of the limitative theorems discovered in metalogic are proposed to approach some forms of suffering as an ontic necessity unavoidable for the same reasons which determine uincompleteness of consistent logical systems.Pozycja Z problematyki cudówWojciechowski, Tadeusz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Struktury charytatywne w KościeleWal, Jan (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)The Service of charity in the Church is carried on in frames of the organizational structures (Caritas Internationalis, National Caritas, Diocesial Caritas, Parish Sections of Caritas) and of the priestly structures (Charitable Boards of the Episcopate; Diocesial Sections of Charitable Priesthood; Parish Charitable Groups). The organizational model of the welfare work spread in the Church on a large scale, beside indubitable good sides of it, as: haring ready handsome financial means; possibility of the full-time and part-time employment; quick reactions in case of urgent help; realization of long-term charitable programs; managing of closed and specialists benevolent institutions (centres) — it has also considerable defects: it gives an occasion to exclusive service of charity, although it is a duty of all God’s People; it causes that the problem of spiritual formation in doing charity is receded into the background and the main accent is being put, first of all, on methodical formation that directly prepares for the welfare work; it bears the danger of subordination of the charitable actions of the Church to political influence. The Second Vatican Council [not calling in question the organizational model of the welfare work] declared itself for the need of displaying the welfare work in priestly structures [dioceses, parishes), The Pope, Paul the Sixth, by the document “Amoris Officio” [July 15, 1971] according to the thought of the Vatican Council, set up the Central Institution in the Church [of priestly kind] called: “Papieska Rada Cor Unum” (“The Pope’s Council of Cor Unum”). That Institution aims at co-ordination of all the charitable initiatives: those of the organizational kind, and those that are undertaken in ordinary priesthood. So, this essay [treatise] shows [from the factual and lawful side] the work of benevolent organizations in the Church with particular including the character and bases of functioning the “Caritas Internationalis” as a confederacy of various, local charitable associations, and it also shows what part the “Pope’s Council of Cor Unum” plays [especially we can see it in its statutes resolved in 1977], That part consists in integration of the whole charitable doings of the Church “ad intra” and “ad extra”; and also it consists in fulfillment [of a much more scale than it can be done by one of the Roman Curia departments called: “The Pope’s Service of Aid and Charity”] the special charitable tasks assigned by the Pope. The Church, after the Second Vatican Council aims at integration of both hitherto existing organizational models of charity service, namely: the priestly model and the organizational model. The ordinary service of charity [in such an interpretation] is undertaken by all God’s People. And the charitable organizations have special tasks to fulfill: in a range of managing of specialized charitable institutions; coming with help in urgent need and extremities [for example: disasters, catastrophes, cataclysms]; realization of long-term charitable programs [ex: the program of elementary education); undertaking (on the Church behalf) co-operation with international, state, social and religious institutions and with other several actions of aid.Pozycja Śladami Nieskończonego. W kręgu myśli E. LevinasaTischner, Józef (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja „Od kacerza do wspólnego nauczyciela”. Marcin Luter w niemieckiej katolickiej historiografii kościelnej XX wiekuSmolinsky, Heribert (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Relikwiarz św. Stanisława z roku 1505 i inne tego typu relikwiarze w PolsceSamek, Jan (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Religijność ludowa w świetle Synodu Biskupów 1974 oraz adhortacji „Evangelii nuntiandi” Pawła VI.Ryłko, Stanisław (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Z poznawczej problematyki substancjiRożdżeński, Roman (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Psychologische Aspekte der altersbedingten KinesophobiePiszkalski, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Pierwszy manifest poezji humanistycznej w PolscePawłowski, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Nauczanie kościelne w Królestwie Polskim w XIX wiekuOlszewski, Daniel (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Katechetyczny aspekt treści liturgii Wielkiego Postu po soborze watykańskim IINanowski, Janusz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Diaspora babilońska – amoraici i saboryciMendecki, Norbert (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Zur „Dulcedo Dei” im Alten TestamentMayberger, Paul (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Psychologiczne aspekty lęku przed śmierciąMakselon, Józef (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)The author considers three main problems connected with the death anxiety: 1) sources and characteristic traits of death anxiety, 2) defense mechanisms in fear of death, and 3) influence of the religious convinctions on the death anxiety. These issues should be a starting-point for the further considerations of the psychopathological and therapeutic aspects of death anxiety. Death anxiety belongs to the most complicated problems in in the thanatological investigations. It has also various relationships with many psycho-social factors. The author argues for the death anxiety is a universal phenomenon and intrinsic to the human condition. Honest and open acknowledgment of the reality and presence of fear of death attributes for personality development (principle of realism).Pozycja Glauben und WissenKolb, Anton (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Współczesne niechrześcijańskie studia o JezusieKamykowski, Łukasz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Problem autorstwa Listu do HebrajczykówJelonek, Tomasz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Problem integralności katechezyJakubiec, Marian (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)Pozycja Ontologiczne zaangażowania współczesnej fizykiHeller, Michał (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1986)The paper deals with the mutual relationship between theories of modern physics and an ontological perspective of the world. Two particular questions are touched upon: first, how different „philosophical ontologies” influence developments of empirical theories, and, second, do scientific theories presuppose any ontological assumptions? Within the context of the first question, ontologies of substance, process, and event are discussed. Ontologies centred at men are also commented upon. As far as the second question is concerned, it is argued that the existence of the world is not assumed, even tacitly, by any empirical theory. All scientific statements are of the conditional form: if the world exists,... Although this condition is seldom expressed explicitly. However, one could ask about „ontological commitments” of scientific theories: if investigated objects do exist, which structure should be ascribed to them? For a mathematical theory, it is, in principici, possible to reconstruct its univers de discours. As far as an empirical theory is concerned, the term „ontological commitment” usually means its more or less intuitive interpretation. Such interpretations for classical mechanics, quantum mechanics and relativity theory are briefly discussed. Every interpretation must be consistent with a given theory, i. e. with its mathematical formalism and its empirical predictions. One can change freely from one such interpretation to another. Therefore, no interpretation informs us what a given theory is about. A hypothesis is put forward that those elements, which are preserved when one goes from one interpretation to another („interpretation invariants”) are what the theory is about. They are some structural elements common to all admissible interpretations. A useful analogy is the „meaning” which could be defined as an invariant of all possible translations of a given text from one language to another.