Roczniki Teologiczne, 2002, T. 49, z. 1
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/9677
Przeglądaj
Ostatnie zgłoszenia
Pozycja Problematyka chronologii absolutnej i chronologii relatywnej życia i działalności św. Pawła ApostołaLangkammer, Hugolin (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Pozycja Galilejskie pochodzenie synoptycznego źródła QPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Galilean towns, like Capernaum, Bethsaida and Chorazin, mentioned in Q suggest a Galilean origin of the document. Other places mentioned there, both the ones that actually existed then (Tyre, Sidon, Jerusalem), and ones existing only in the imagination of people of those times who knew the Old Testament (Sodom, Nineveh) are mention from the perspective of one who is situated centrally with respect to them. This speaks for Galilee as the place where the writers of Q were staying. Numerous images and metaphors from agricultural, rural life, but also from urban life, confirm this opinion. A positive image of the nature suggests urbanisation of Galilee in not a distant time. According to the author of the article the document could be written on the area between Tiberias and Nazareth.Pozycja Datacja pierwszej misji Pawła w KoryncieRakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)The author of the article tries to determine the years of St Paul’s first mission to Corinth. In order to do this he presents a review of the state of research from which it follows that 50- 51 AD is the most often mentioned year. However, there are opinions that the Apostle came to Corinth for the first time at the beginning of the forties. The difference in the opinions results from the two premises on which the above datings are based: the time of Gallio’s proconsulate and expulsion of Jews from Rome at the time of Claudius. Analysing the above historical facts the author comes to the conclusion that the year of expulsion of Jews from Rome (41 or 49) is not unequivocally determined, and hence dating St Paul’s first mission to Corinth as the beginning of the forties is doubtful. The time of Gallio’s proconsulate in the years 51-52 should be considered a sure base for the chronology of St Paul. Since he came to Corinth more than a year before Gallio took office, his first mission to that town would last from February/March 50 to August/September 51. Defining the Apostle’s stay in Corinth also allows pointing to the moment of the beginning of his journey that brought him to the capital of Achaia. Evangelising the previous centres took Paul at least two years, so he set off from Antioch no later than spring 48; however, it is more probable that it happened a year earlier.Pozycja Przyczynek do dyskusji na temat powstania 1 Kor na wiosnęRakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)The contribution undertakes the problem of the season of the year, when St Paul wrote 1 Cor. Among the authors the opinion prevails that it was in the spring months. The author of the article first analyses the events that happened between 1 Cor and the probable leaving Ephesus by Paul (cf. 16, 8); then – how long they lasted: the sea voyage between Ephesus and Corinth that he had to go on a few times. This leads to the conclusion that the hypothesis of “spring” is possible only if the Apostle left Ephesus later than on the feast of Quinquagesima. Besides this the author of the article gives two reasons why 1 Cor must have been written in the autumn of the last but one calendar year of Paul’s stay in Ephesus. The first of them is based on an analysis of the course of collection for the poor in Jerusalem, whose beginning is shown in 1 Cor 16, 1-3. The second reason follows from an analysis of the Apostle’s plans in 16, 8-9, which text is an explanation why the stay in Ephesus was prolonged; under different circumstances he would leave the town sooner.Pozycja Skała Izraela w świetle wiersza Pwt 32, 18Szwarc, Urszula (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)The paper presents an analysis of Dtn 32,6.10-12.13b. 18. Its aim is to define what the inspired author understood by the term “Rock” in Dtn 32,18. The research conducted by the author allows stating the fact of Divine parenthood of the Rock of Israel, identified with Jhwh, with relation to the chosen nation. It also makes it possible to define what it consists in. According to the discussed verses, this reality is expressed in the act of giving birth, in the meaning of creating an exceptional – in the history of mankind – nation from not very significant tribes. It is also shown in the Rock-Parent’s constant and unconditional protection provided to Israel. This may be seen in various ways: supporting the existence of the chosen nation, instructing and directing it, protecting it from threats, saving it from danger.Pozycja Bóg jako ojciec według Apokalipsy św. JanaKiejza, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Pozycja Język Septuaginty i jego wpływ na autora trzeciej EwangeliiMielcarek, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)The article deals with issues concerning language and style of LXX and its impact on the New Testament writings and especially on Luke-Acts. Even though establishing of septuagintal text is a very problematical matter, one should view the collection of Greek OT books as a common and relatively homogenous tradition having its own language and style. The language of LXX is apparently present in Luke-Acts on four levels: terminology, phraseology, syntax and style. This is valid not only for special stories as the infant narratives but for the general bulk of lucan work as well. Luke seems to deliberately work on the text to make it alike septuagintal traditions in order to show to the reader that both OT and NT writings belong to the same divine history of salvation. The article deals with issues concerning language and style of LXX and its impact on the New Testament writings and especially on Luke-Acts. Even though establishing of septuagintal text is a very problematical matter, one should view the collection of Greek OT books as a common and relatively homogenous tradition having its own language and style. The language of LXX is apparently present in Luke-Acts on four levels: terminology, phraseology, syntax and style. This is valid not only for special stories as the infant narratives but for the general bulk of lucan work as well. Luke seems to deliberately work on the text to make it alike septuagintal traditions in order to show to the reader that both OT and NT writings belong to the same divine history of salvation.Pozycja Gdzie został ochrzczony Jezus i skąd to wiemy?Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)According to the gospels, Jesus was baptized by John on the east bank of the Jordan, but apart from the fact that it was across the river from Jericho no details are given. The reports left by the earliest pilgrims and archaeological remains, permit us to pinpoint with a very high degree of accuracy the site venerated as the place of the baptism of Jesus in the Byzantine period. What interested pilgrims of all periods, however, was the water of the river in which by immersion they could renew their baptism. It was irrelevant to them whether they reached the water from the east bank or the west bank. Thus the current debate between Israel and Jordan is pointless.Pozycja Podejście kanoniczne w interpretacji Pisma ŚwiętegoSzymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)The author of the article discusses the most important aspects of the canonical approach in the interpretation of the Bible, which until now has been absent from Polish biblical literature. The presentation consists of four points. Firstly, historical development of canonical criticism is shown, first of all in B. S. Childs’ and J. A. Sanders’ works (1); next the most important methodological postulates of the new approach are presented: negative ones, i.e. criticism of historical-critical methodology (2), and positive ones, i.e. the most important norms of interpretation of biblical texts in the canonical approach (3). The article is concluded with a short discussion of critical and polemic opinions about B. S. Childs’ hermeneutic postulates (4). In the author’s opinion, the discussions led around the canonical approach reflect a much deeper problem that has been pervading Catholic and non-Catholic study of the Bible for years, namely, it makes exegetes realise the tension that exists between (post)positivist postulates of the historical-critical methodology and the inspired character of the biblical texts that are God’s living word. The only answer to the mentioned dichotomy may be a unanimous cooperation of the reason and faith in the domain of biblical studies (cf. John Paul II, the encyclical Fides et ratio, no 94).Pozycja Etymologia nazwy „Esseńczycy”Tronina, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Pozycja Kim jest άνθρωποκτόνς w J 8, 44?Wróbel, Mirosław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Author in his article tries to answer on the question – who is the άνθρωποκτόνς in John 8, 44? A carefully analysis of John 8, 44 within the context of its Semitic background allows to discern various possibilities for its interpretation. In fact, in the history of exegesis we can distinguish three proposals regarding the identity of the άνθρωποκτόνς in Jn 8, 44. 1) the Demiurge (the father of the Devil); 2) the Devil; 3) Cain – the murderer of his brother Abel (Gen 4, 2-16). Author makes an overview of the argumentation which support the diverse proposals about the origin of the άνθρωποκτόνς. Analyzing the textual evidence author can reconstruct the stages of the textual development of Jn 8, 44. Indicating textual connections between Jn 8, 37-44 and 1Jn 3, 8-12. 15 he makes conclusion that both texts were produced by the same school.Pozycja Kronika Instytutu Nauk Biblijnych KUL za rok akad. 2000/2001Kiejza, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Pozycja Dean Ph. Bechard, Paul Outside the Walls: A Study of Luke’s Sociogeographical Universalism in Acts 14: 8-20 (AnBib 143), Rome 2000, ss. 541 (z indeksami).Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)