Znaczenie ofiary ʻōlāh w Leviticus 1. Rozważania z pogranicza translatoryki biblijnej i antropologii kulturowej
Data
2017
Autorzy
Tytuł czasopisma
ISSN czasopisma
Tytuł tomu
Wydawca
Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu
Abstrakt
The article shows that the noun ʻōlāh in Leviticus 1 usually is translated according to the long-standing tradition of “holocaust” or “burnt offering”. However, this practice does not transmit etymology of the word derivative of the verb ʻōlāh, meaning “to ascend”, “to climb up”, “to go up”. The article gives an overview of major examples of Bible translations of the noun in Leviticus 1 as well as of most important commentators giving their explanations of its meaning. A due consideration is also given to key proposals of technical translation of ʻōlāh (Buber–Rosenzweig, E. Fox, J.B. Jordan), focusing specially on etymology of the noun. In turn, discussed are arguments of a few important cultural anthropologists, who suggest that main ancient cultures identified animals with humans. Finally, the article turns to explaining possible significances of offering rituals in Leviticus 1, in light of the animal-human identification. It is suggested that the noun ʻōlāh better would be translated as “ascension offering”, as the name points to the effect it has on men, in accordance with meanings of two other offerings, purification and peace. Didactically, ʻōlāh would indicate that a sinful man can ascend to the holy God through a sort of transformation, through some kind of death.
Opis
Słowa kluczowe
rzeczownik ʻōlāh, tłumaczenia, przekłady, antropologia kulturowa, zwierzęta jako symbole, ryty ofiarnicze, zwierzęta, symbol, symbolika, Biblia, Pismo Święte, Stary Testament, Księga Kapłańska, Kpł, tłumaczenia Biblii, przekłady Biblii, komentarze biblijne, ofiara, rytuały, noun ʻōlāh, translations, cultural anthropology, animals as symbols, offering rituals, animals, imagery, Bible, Old Testament, Book of Leviticus, Leviticus 1, translations of the Bible, biblical commentaries, offering, rituals
Cytowanie
Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny, 2017, R. 25, Nr 2, s. 67-80.
Licencja
CC-BY-SA - Uznanie autorstwa - Na tych samych warunkach