Porozumieć się z Bogiem „stukając w ścianę”…? O symbolu w filozofii religii Paula Tillicha

dc.contributor.authorNapadło, Marcin
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T13:36:48Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T13:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractIn the article, it was underlined by the means of a metaphor that a religious experience is never direct knowledge of God or the Absolute. It was pointed out that the symbol is what both builds a relationship with God or the sacred (Latin: sacrum) and separates a man from Him or the sacred. This paper discusses the chosen aspects of the question of the symbol in the works of Paul Tillich. Paul Tillich – a German pastor, a theologian, a philosopher, an expert in culture and a historian of religion – attempted to translate the language of the religious tradition of the Western culture into the language which would be adequate and comprehensible for the present day. He recognised the symbol as the only language of religion through which religion may express itself directly. Tillich did not give one simple definition of the symbol. He noticed that symbols belong to the field of signs and therefore there is a tendency to confuse them. He developed his ideas by presenting essential features of these notions and differences between them. The analysis of the German thinker’s theory of the symbol indicates how one can notice through the symbol, what is ideal or transcendent by its nature. The symbol opens before us inaccessible levels of the reality and the soul. Tillich’s considerations lead us from the general theory of the symbol to the religious one. The German philosopher claimed that the religious symbol has its own specific features. It has a transcendent basis for existence. The religious symbol refers to holiness (Latin: sacrum). The Protestant thinker tried to find a transition from the phenomenological level of experience of the sacred to the level of ontological claims about the objective reality. The last part of the article provides some conclusions. The language of symbols cannot be understood without the community of the faithful, and the symbol means nothing without faith. The symbol helps us to understand the rich and complex reality.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudia Paradyskie, 2010, t. 20, s. 53-68.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-932686-0- 3
dc.identifier.urihttp://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/4965
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Filozoficzno-Teologiczny im. Edyty Steinpl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectsymbolpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbole religijnepl_PL
dc.subjectreligious symbolspl_PL
dc.subjectreligiapl_PL
dc.subjectreligionpl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofiapl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophypl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofia religiipl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophy of religionpl_PL
dc.subjectsacrumpl_PL
dc.subjectBógpl_PL
dc.subjectGodpl_PL
dc.subjectPaul Tillichpl_PL
dc.titlePorozumieć się z Bogiem „stukając w ścianę”…? O symbolu w filozofii religii Paula Tillichapl_PL
dc.title.alternativeCommunicate with God by „knocking on the wall”…? On the symbol in Paul Tillich’s philosophy of religionpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Napadlo_Porozumiec_sie_z_Bogiem.pdf
Rozmiar:
392.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Opis: