O wielkości i granicach dowodów na istnienie Boga
Ładowanie...
Data
2021
Autorzy
Tytuł czasopisma
ISSN czasopisma
Tytuł tomu
Wydawca
Wydawnictwo Pallottinum
Abstrakt
The validity and soundness of proofs for the existence of God are heavily disputed in philosophy of religion and theology. We argue that the main purpose of such proofs is to clarify the meaning of the concept ‘God’ and to reveal logical requirements and implications of theistic belief. With reference to Anselm of Canterbury, Alvin Plantinga and Charles Hartshorne, we present and discuss the Ontological Argument, concluding that it can still be rationally defended, but only with the presumption that God grounds ontological modality independent of human thought categories. This strong epistemological thesis is outlined in the Alethological Argument, which we discuss with reference to Augustine, Hans Jonas and Robert Spaemann. The argument postulates an isomorphic relation between thought/language and being, which not only implies moderate metaphysical realism, but also necessitates the existence of God to warrant this relationship.
Opis
Artykuł w języku niemieckim.
Słowa kluczowe
dowody na istnienie Boga, argument ontologiczny, realizm, Anzelm z Canterbury, proof of God’s existence, evidence for the existence of God, ontological argument, realism, Anselm of Canterbury, doktorzy Kościoła, Doctors of the Church, Beweise für die Existenz Gottes, ontologisches Argument, Realismus
Cytowanie
Communio, 2021, R. 41, nr 1 (213), s. 74-96.
Licencja
CC-BY-SA - Uznanie autorstwa - Na tych samych warunkach