Źródła i specyfika XVI-wiecznych dyskusji teologicznych w „kwestii Indii”

dc.contributor.authorMiotk, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T06:16:43Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T06:16:43Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThe subject of the treatise refers to theological debates on the so-called “Indian question”, which arose due to Columbus’ discovery travels and the Spanish conquest of the “New World” The author gives a brief description of the attempts to justify the conquest within the mission patronage based on “Alexandrian donation”, as well as some problems connected with setting anthropological, legal and theological status of the Indian population. The justification of the Spanish invasions, which was contained in Requerimiento (1513), gave the Spanish authorities the right to use force towards the Indians who offered resistance. The “Salamanca School” played an important role in reflecting upon the Indian rights and defending their freedom; some theologians and Dominican missionaries, like Antonio Montesiono, Pedro da Cordoba, Bartolome de Las Casas, Francesco de Vitoria, Domingo and Pedro de Soto, were closely connected with that School. The situation of the Indians was, however, predominantly affected by the views of John Mair, Juan Sepulveda and some other theologians, who refused to acknowledge the Indians as full-right-humans, considering them to be slaves, according to Aristotle’s concept of “barbarians” and the so-called “sins against nature”, allegedly committed by the Indians. A renewal of scholastic theology, which took place mainly in Salamanca, made it possible to work out new theological arguments in defense of rationalism, freedom and property with regard to the Indians. It was due to drawing a distinction between the natural and supernatural order. The scholastic thinkers emphasized the autonomy of natural order, which cannot be disturbed by either sin or grace; grace can merely lead to its improvement. Consequently, all people are equal since they can tell the difference between the good and the evil thanks to the natural light of the mind. Thanks to such people as Bartolome de Las Casas and Francesco de Vitoria an ethical aspect of colonizing the Indians found expression. Chiapas Las Casas, later to become bishop, fervently unmasked injustice done to the Indians, and his famous dispute with the royal theologian Juan Sepulveda in Valladolid (1550) provided an opportunity to question all reasons for America’s conquest and reject Aristotle’s philosophical concepts as arguments to legitimize unjust enslavement of the Indians.pl_PL
dc.identifier.citationStudia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego, 2006, T. 26, s. 123-149.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn83-60244-43-X
dc.identifier.urihttp://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/18584
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherUniwersytet Opolski. Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznegopl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectdyskusje teologiczne w kwestii Indiipl_PL
dc.subjectIndiepl_PL
dc.subjectdyskusje teologiczne w kwestii Indii w XVI w.pl_PL
dc.subjectXVI w.pl_PL
dc.subjectdyskusjapl_PL
dc.subjectRequerimiento z 1513 r.pl_PL
dc.subjecttradycjapl_PL
dc.subjectbłąd Hostiensisapl_PL
dc.subjectantropologiapl_PL
dc.subjectIndianiepl_PL
dc.subjectJohn Mairpl_PL
dc.subjectkwestia antropologiczna Indian w ujęciu Johna Mairapl_PL
dc.subjectprzymuspl_PL
dc.subjectteologiczne uzasadnienie stosowania przymusupl_PL
dc.subjectteologiapl_PL
dc.subjectporządek naturalnypl_PL
dc.subjectporządek nadprzyrodzonypl_PL
dc.subjectsprawiedliwość wyrównującapl_PL
dc.subjectsprawiedliwość rozdzielczapl_PL
dc.subjectsprawiedliwośćpl_PL
dc.subjectwojna sprawiedliwapl_PL
dc.subjectsytuacja prawna Indianpl_PL
dc.subjectprawo naturalnepl_PL
dc.subjectwojnapl_PL
dc.subjectewangelizacjapl_PL
dc.subjectkolonializmpl_PL
dc.subjectchrzestpl_PL
dc.subjectprzymusowy chrzestpl_PL
dc.subjectIndiapl_PL
dc.subjecttheological discussions on the India question in the 16th centurypl_PL
dc.subjecttheological discussions on the India questionpl_PL
dc.subjectdiscussionpl_PL
dc.subjecttraditionpl_PL
dc.subjectEnrico Segusiopl_PL
dc.subjectHostiensispl_PL
dc.subjectanthropologypl_PL
dc.subjectanthropological question of the Indians as seen by John Mairpl_PL
dc.subjectIndianspl_PL
dc.subjectconstraintpl_PL
dc.subjecttheological justification of using constraintpl_PL
dc.subjecttheologypl_PL
dc.subjectnatural orderpl_PL
dc.subjectsupernatural orderpl_PL
dc.subjectcompensatory justicepl_PL
dc.subjectdistributive justicepl_PL
dc.subjectjusticepl_PL
dc.subjectjust warpl_PL
dc.subjectlegal situation of Indianspl_PL
dc.subjectnatural lawpl_PL
dc.subjectwarpl_PL
dc.subjectevangelizationpl_PL
dc.subjectcolonialismpl_PL
dc.subjectbaptismpl_PL
dc.subjectcompulsory baptismpl_PL
dc.subjectBartolome de Las Casaspl_PL
dc.subjectJuan Gines Sepulvedapl_PL
dc.subjectźródłapl_PL
dc.subjectsourcespl_PL
dc.subjectHostiensis' errorpl_PL
dc.titleŹródła i specyfika XVI-wiecznych dyskusji teologicznych w „kwestii Indii”pl_PL
dc.title.alternativeSources and specifics of 16th century theological debates about the “Indian question”pl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Ładowanie...
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Miotk_Zrodla_i_specyfika.pdf
Rozmiar:
3.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Opis: