Zagadnienia teodycei systemowej

Abstract

This work is an attempt another then classical philosophy of God. Therefore, as the starting point of the metaphysical considerations we use the term “a system”, but not as in classical philosophy, where exist the term “a being” (ens). Definition of the system isn’t an invention of the "pure” theory, but it has its base in outlining the intuition of this term that existed through many centuries and particulary in the present century. In the first chapter we present the stages of evolution of the consept of the term “the system”, beginning with an understanding of this term as used by the ancients, till coming into existence the new metaphisical category. As a second important point in support of these considerations the theorem on a logical equivalence of the sentences “the system exists” and “the system is active (is in action)” is proved, for these same systems; it implies somewhat dissimilar to the classical understanding of the term “the existence”. The problem of systemic theodicy results from insufficiency of classical philosophy to answer some questions resulting from the Revelation, i.e. a question on the essence of the Absolute. These difficulties cause us to look for the more probable theodicy, and simultaneously expressed in the contemporary language. For metaphysical considerations we use the classical philosophy method. It means, we assume direct experimentable perception as a base of cognition, though in theorem proofs we used the tautologies of the classical logic. As an application of the system metaphysics we consider only a few the most important problems: Three-One-God (His existence, His action, and His Name), Jesus Christ, the Church and a Man.