Seminare, 2003, Tom 19
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/40801
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Seminare, 2003, Tom 19 wg Temat "antropologia"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Liturgia „tempus et locus” wychowania – realistyczna pedagogia świętościChrobak, Stanisław (Wyższe Seminaria Duchowne Towarzystwa Salezjańskiego, 2003)All words, things, activities we are used in liturgy should prepare us to personally contact with God in transcendental dimension. In that point of view, the liturgy as tempus et locus of education, shows us that real belonging to Jesus Christ has created a new personality, a new consciousness, a new sense of confidence of himself. The mystery of human, according to Vaticanum Secundum doctrine, shows us the Mystery of Incarnation Word (compare Lumen gentium, n. 22). Because of education, including especially liturgical education, a human being must identify himself as a subject and person. The man has, not only, a part in Jesus Christ life, but the first of all, in His mission. He must remember to be His witness, to live according Jesus advises, to accept the Gospel truth and try to reach a sanctity by realizing his humanity. Jesus Christ, present in His Church especially in liturgical ritual, becomes a place when express an activity of God sanctifying a man and activity a human adoring a God. As we can see, only a human have an ability to know himself, to control the situation, to share himself with the others people and make a community with the other human being. The man, thanks to grace of God, is called to make an alliance of his Creator.Pozycja W stronę bioetyki personalistycznejHołub, Grzegorz (Wyższe Seminaria Duchowne Towarzystwa Salezjańskiego, 2003)This article evaluates the influence of the modern philosophical ways of thinking on bioethics, especially in the English-speaking countries. We can notice such philosophical methods as theory of principles, virtue theory, casuistry, and theory of contract. The aim of this article is to present the manners in which these methods explain the basic moral concepts. In the most cases they only use one of the philosophical categories, failing to include others. It means that they draw upon ethical concepts as only imperative, or aim, or virtue, or value, or contract. The process of analysing also unveils that their extent is far from the meaning worked out by the traditional, ethical thought. The last part of the article indicates at personalistic concepts of bioethics. It seems to be an adequate remedy for the lack of the mentioned theories. It draws simultaneously upon all the necessary elements of the objective moral order (imperative, aim, virtue, value). The main category of this approach is a concept of the person, which rules over all mentioned ethical factors. It means that the person is a focal point of imperative, aim, virtue and value. It leads to the conclusion that bioethics should develop this foundational idea; however, it is a task shared with the personalistic ethics and anthropology.

