Analecta Cracoviensia, 2011, T. 43
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/13619
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Analecta Cracoviensia, 2011, T. 43 wg Temat "antiquity"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Napiętnowanie niewierności i obłudy narodu wybranego przez proroków okresu asyryjskiego w państwie południowymAdamczyk, Dariusz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, 2011)Prophets of Assyrian period in south nation stigmatize infidelity of the chosen nation, pride, sins of leaders and hypocrisy and deviation of cultural practices. Sins of leaders of Israel especially aim in social order. Prophets of VIII century before Christ criticize celebrated cult by these, who say that during victims, pilgrimages, or external prayer can enter into direct relationship with the God. Meanwhile the way access to the God is listen his words and perform his will, what should be reflected in social relations and in practice of justice and mercy. The minor thing of prophets irritation is attitude and behavior holding the cult. Prophets show that sins of the chosen nation will bring God’s punishment and irreversible judgment day. The nation can gain forgiveness, so prophets invoke Israelites to conversion.Pozycja Tytuł Boga RḤMNN – „Miłosierny” z żydowskich i chrześcijańskich inskrypcji przedmuzułmańskiej Arabii. Politeistyczna czy monoteistyczna geneza koranicznego ar-Raḥmān?Kościelniak, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, 2011)Recited several times as part of the Muslim daily prayers basiamo contains three definite nouns: Allah, Raḥmān and Raḥmīm ([…]; bismi-llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm). Especially the epithet […] ( Raḥmān – “the Merciful”), which is found in the Sabaean inscriptions in the form RḤMNN (Raḥmānān), has a relatively long history in the Middle East. The study of the pre-Islamic Arabic cultures provides the context of numerous religious interactions in the evolution of Raḥmān's meaning. RḤMNN – used by Polytheist Arabs, Jews and Christians – is constantly confirmed in inscriptions, particularly from the so-called “Late Sabaean Period” (after 380) that were associated with Monotheism. During that time Judaism and Christianity attempted to replace the traditional South Arabian religion. Muhammad might have borrowed this name from three sources, which were present in his milieu. RḤMNN – [...] understood by Jews and Christians as “Lord, the Merciful, Master of Heaven” was useful for Islam, the new Monotheistic religion. On the other hand, in South Arabia RḤMNN signified a Moon-god, whom Muhammad even occasionally confused with “Allah” or used as a substitute for “Allah”.Pozycja Wiktoryn z Poetovium – pierwszy chrześcijański egzegeta łacińskiKasprzak, Dariusz (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, 2011)Victorinus of Poetovium (modern Ptuj in Slovenia) was a Pannonian bishop at the main custom post on the confines of the Eastern and Western Empire (near the border of Pannonia and Noricum). He was martyred during the persecution of the Emperor Diocletian. The hypothesis that he was martyred later during the reign of Numerian is unsupported by evidence. St. Victorinus was the first Latin exegete. His writings reveal a mixture of the Judeo-Christian (Papias of Hierapolis, St. Ireneus of Lyon) and the Alexandrian exegesies (Origen). The Commentary on the Apocalyps, the short tract On the construction o f the world (De fabrica mundi) and commentary on the Parable o f the ten Virgins are the remnants of his great literary heritage, which was described by St. Jerome. Victorinus didn’t consider the biblical texts systematically but rather he commented on short selected fragments of the Bible. Following the Alexandrian allegorical exegesis, St. Victorinus focused on the different meanings of the number Seven. His allegorical treatment of the biblical text frequently became a typology. The John’s Apocalypse was crucial to the interpretation of Holy Scripture in St. Victorinus’ exegesis. Victorinus seems to have been the first to lay down the principle of interpretation in relation to the Book of Revelation. He accentuated that the God’s preaching is the only one but it is expressed in different ways in the Holy Scripture. He pointed up Christocentrisism of the biblical Revelation and the spiritual sense of each biblical text, which was closely connected and regarded the Holy Spirit as the main Author of all Scripture. Victorinus stressed also the unanimity of the biblical message in both the Old and the New Testaments.